Re: Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, ...
From: adam (storage@eu.iewebs.com)
Date: Sun Nov 05 2000 - 14:53:54 EST
- Next message: Florian Effenberger: "Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, ... message doubles?"
- Previous message: William X. Walsh: "Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, ..."
- In reply to: William X. Walsh: "Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, ..."
- Next in thread: Marc Schneiders: "Re: Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, ..."
- Reply: Marc Schneiders: "Re: Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, ..."
- Reply: Lee Hodgson (DomainGuideBook.com): "Re: Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, ..."
- Reply: William X. Walsh: "Re[4]: .web, .nom, .shop, ..."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
"William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com> said:
> > Domain aggregators are scum, however, and deserve
> > nothing less than LARTing.
>
> Yes, so are commodity speculators. Better ban them also.
>
Exactly the kind of response I have come to expect from you William, well
done.
I dunno, next ye'll be telling me that spam is ok, and ye actually enjoy
getting huge quanities of unsolicited rubbish in your Inboxes. You people are
nuts.
adam
- Next message: Florian Effenberger: "Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, ... message doubles?"
- Previous message: William X. Walsh: "Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, ..."
- In reply to: William X. Walsh: "Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, ..."
- Next in thread: Marc Schneiders: "Re: Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, ..."
- Reply: Marc Schneiders: "Re: Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, ..."
- Reply: Lee Hodgson (DomainGuideBook.com): "Re: Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, ..."
- Reply: William X. Walsh: "Re[4]: .web, .nom, .shop, ..."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3
: Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:36:04 EDT