Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ...
From: adam (storage@eu.iewebs.com)
Date: Sun Nov 05 2000 - 09:47:07 EST
- Next message: Lee Hodgson (DomainGuideBook.com): "Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ..."
- Previous message: Heather Peel: "RE: internic.ca unfair advantage???"
- In reply to: Marc Schneiders: "Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ..."
- Next in thread: Marc Schneiders: "Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ..."
- Reply: Marc Schneiders: "Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ..."
- Reply: William X. Walsh: "Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, ..."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
Marc Schneiders <marc@schneiders.org> said:
> I can see that you have thought about this very long, since you
> present your reasons for the measures you suggest in such a balanced
> way.
>
There's nothing good to be said about domain aggregators. Nothing. They're in
the same class as spammers.
adam
- Next message: Lee Hodgson (DomainGuideBook.com): "Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ..."
- Previous message: Heather Peel: "RE: internic.ca unfair advantage???"
- In reply to: Marc Schneiders: "Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ..."
- Next in thread: Marc Schneiders: "Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ..."
- Reply: Marc Schneiders: "Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ..."
- Reply: William X. Walsh: "Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, ..."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3
: Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:36:04 EDT